Recent News
The Wall Street Journal reports that Exxon has cut off funding to groups that questioned the validity of global warming and connections to fossil fuels. The article says Exxon states that, "climate-science models that link greenhouse-gas concentrations to global warming are getting more reliable ." |
Home 
Social Culture Behind the Scenes Toxic Chemicals in Everyday Products: What Would the EU Do?
Social Culture Behind the Scenes Toxic Chemicals in Everyday Products: What Would the EU Do?
| Toxic Chemicals in Everyday Products: What Would the EU Do? |
| Written by Michelle Haimoff | |||
|
If universal health care were a reality in the United States, would the regulation of harmful products be tighter since the government would have to deal with the long-term health (read: economic) consequences? I recently attended an author's talk at The Nation's offices on Irving Place for Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products and What's At Stake for American Power written by Mark Schapiro. The book looks at the initiatives that have been taken in the European Union since the June 25, 2004 election that unified the countries' food and drug regulations. When the EU surpassed the United States as the world's largest economy, its regulating committee decided to extensively study the role chemicals were playing in cosmetics, automobiles, toys and household items. The result was the discovery of carcinogenic ingredients, as well as chemicals that damage the nervous and reproductive systems, and a "Negative List" of chemicals that are no longer allowed in European cosmetics. Not only does the US not have a similar list, but because we don't hold ourselves to EU standards (or even China standards, as China is aligning their production operations with those of Europe), the US has become a dumping ground for toxic products that have been banned in other countries. Although Shapiro did not explicitly state that the solution is a universal health care system, one has to wonder if the American government would have greater incentive to take preventative measures now if they were assured to pay the long-term consequences later. 
|
Latest Postings
- Energy Stocks Got a Boost Monday
- 12 Interesting Things I Learned at The Feast
- In a Warming World Coastal Forests Are the Only Defense
- FDA Approvals and What They Mean to You
- What Happens to the Stock Market if Obama Becomes the CEO of America?
- Global Bailouts Will Lead to Global Inflation: How to Play It
- Global Bailouts Will Lead to Global Inflation: How to Play It
- Exxon Mobil (XOM) Works On Its Eco Image
- Bush's Final Legacy: Stealth Tort Reform
- Amendment 58 in Colorado Seeks to End Subsidies for Big Oil
- Have the Numbers Gotten Too Big to Understand?
- Why Paulson Can't Clean Up the Pollution on Wall Street
- Will the Real David Icke Please Sit Down
- Beyond Growth: The Wealth of Community
- Big Oil Falls with the Stock Market
- The Rebirth of the System: From Caterpillar to Butterfly
- Pain Relief Without Addiction
- Why I Like Obama on Energy
- The Feast: Social Innovation Conference
- Vaccination Side Effects, Sponsored by Merck
- We Won!!!
- Reframe It: Reading Between the Lines
- The Next Great Pandemic
- Tesoro (TSO) Fights California Ethanol Mandate
- Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds